Katie Sanders wrote:QUOTE (Katie Sanders @ Mar 30 2013, 11:50 AM) Basically, I don't remember how I maybe dropped a stitch or something, but the knitting managed to like....reverse? So there's a portion where I am at where some parts clearly have three rows and others four. No biggie, right? Alas, it's a little biggie. You see, the direction of the actual knitting is towards the larger stuff, as in my working yarn is away from the smaller stuff, and I don't know how to put it back.
I may be the world's most incompetent person. I considered startting over, but I'm stubborn and wanted to see if this could get fixed first. Thanks!
Hey, Katie,
Sorry for the bit of a delay. I was indeed, as Tarma mentioned, having an exciting few days, and then I wanted to have a bit of a think on this before replying.
First, you are not the world's most incompetent person; every knitter does something weird and, to them, unexplainable with their knitting. It's part of the fun... or something.
I think Tarma hit the nail on the proverbial head in her "diagnosis," that you made an accidental short row. You could do something like Dario suggests, if you can figure out where you have the extra stitches, but that will probably make your washcloth buckle a bit (meaning it won't be flat). If you're okay with the imperfection, whether you use Dario's suggestion or just keep knitting the pattern and have that one spot that's a bit unlike the rest, that's perfectly fine.
Nothing for the class needs to be knitted perfectly.
If you want to fix it, depending on how far you've gotten since then, you can; it just involves ripping stitches out in some fashion or other. The most obvious choice is to undo the whole thing and start from scratch, though it's perfectly understandable if you'd rather not. If you're several rows past the spot, it may be easiest to take the needle out and unravel the knitting to that spot. Actually, when I have to do this, I like to do it to the row above the problem area and then tink back the rest of the way; this way I know I've got everything properly lined up to knit again.
What do I mean by "tink"? I bet you're asking. Well, that's the other way to rip out your stitches, though it's certainly not as nonchalant as ripping sounds. To tink is to knit backwards (because it's knit spelled backwards;
get it?). If you're a few stitches away, or even a row away from an error, it's the easiest way to go back and fix it. I made a video demonstrating how to do it; you can find it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz3DKsh02ic (It's linked in the class FAQ, but it's not embedded, so it's probably easy to miss.)
Prof. Dario Sehovic wrote:QUOTE (Prof. Dario Sehovic @ Apr 1 2013, 08:38 AM) *pops in, even if he doesn't belong here >_>*
That happened to me the other day when someone rang the doorbell and I had to open the door

. When I noticed it was already too late to undo everything, so I just doubled the skipped stitches...
<snip>
Aaaand by doing that, I evened out the stitches
(I hope this makes sense)
Psh, Dario, you're welcome here whenever you'd like.
Am I correct in thinking that your method of dealing with your skipped stitches resulted in a bit of a bump or buckle in your knitting? If it was only a row, it's probably not a big bump, but based on my understanding of knitting physics, I can't imagine you could do what you say you did and not get a bit of a bump.
Prof. Tarma Amelia Black wrote:QUOTE (Prof. Tarma Amelia Black @ Apr 1 2013, 12:15 PM) Professor Mott (aka The Cheeky One) has an expression - Frog it.
(I think that is correct.)
You .... rip it out.
Get it? Rippet rippet.
It's not like I made it up, you know. Yes, sometimes knitting terms are a bit cheesy (or, if you'd prefer, corny *cg*), but they're sort of fun, right? Though, to be fair, I'm not sure whether it's strictly a knitting
term or more knitting
jargon.
